ExpressValidator 0.20.0

ExpressValidator is a library that provides the ability to validate objects using the FluentValidation library, but without object inheritance from AbstractValidator.

Key Features

• Easy on-the-fly creation of object validator class called ExpressValidator by using ExpressValidatorBuilder.
• Possibility to dynamically change the parameters of the FluentValidation validators.
• Supports adding a property or field for validation via AddProperty, AddField, or the unified AddMember method.
• Supports validation of values supplied by Func delegates via the AddFunc method.
• Supports validation of indexed properties.
• Composition-based property validation with SetExpressValidator — define complex property validators inline without inheriting from PropertyValidator.
• Built-in null tolerance - null root instances fail validation instead of throwing exceptions.
• Quick and easy validation with QuickValidator, with robust support for null values.
• Supports asynchronous validation.
• Targets .NET Standard 2.0+

Usage

//Class we want to validate
public class ObjToValidate
{
	public int I { get; set; }
	public string S { get; set; }
	public string _sField;
	public int PercentValue1 { get; set; }
	public int PercentValue2 { get; set; }
}

var result = new ExpressValidatorBuilder<ObjToValidate>()
				//Choose property to validate
				.AddProperty(o => o.I)
				//Usual FluentValidation rules here
				.WithValidation(rbo => rbo.GreaterThan(0))
				//Choose other property
				.AddProperty(o => o.S)
				//And set rules again
				.WithValidation(rbo => rbo.MaximumLength(1))
				//Choose field to validate
				.AddField(o => o._sField)
				//And set rules for the field
				.WithValidation(rbo => rbo.MinimumLength(1))
				//Add the Func that returns sum of percentage properties for validation
				.AddFunc(o => o.PercentValue1 + o.PercentValue2, "percentSum")
				//And set rules for the sum of percentages
				.WithValidation(rbo => rbo.InclusiveBetween(0, 100))
				//We get IExpressValidator<ObjToValidate> after calling the Build method
				.Build()
	 			//And finally validate the object
				.Validate(new ObjToValidate() { I = i, S = s, PercentValue1 = pv1, PercentValue2 = pv2 });
if(!result.IsValid)
{
    //As usual with validation result...
}

Using AddMember

AddMember accepts either a property or a field expression, so you don't need to choose between AddProperty and AddField at the call site:

// Works for both properties and fields interchangeably.
var result = new ExpressValidatorBuilder<ObjToValidate>()
				.AddMember(o => o.I)
				.WithValidation(rbo => rbo.GreaterThan(0))
				.AddMember(o => o._sField)
				.WithValidation(rbo => rbo.MinimumLength(1))
				.Build()
				.Validate(new ObjToValidate() { I = i, _sField = sf });
if(!result.IsValid)
{
    //As usual with validation result...
}

Passing an expression that is not a property or field access (e.g. a method call) throws ArgumentException.

Modifying FluentValidation Validator Parameters Using Options

To dynamically change the parameters of the FluentValidation validators:

1. Create an options object that contains the parameters of validators.
2. Configure the ExpressValidatorBuilder<TObj, TOptions> builder using the options object.
3. Pass the options to the builder's Build method.
4. Created IExpressValidator<TObj> validator will validate an a TObj object using parameters from the options object.

To validate an object with different parameters, simply rebuild the validator using the same builder with the different options.

See example below.

//Object with options
var objToValidateOptions = new ObjToValidateOptions()
			{
				IGreaterThanValue = 0,
				SMaximumLengthValue = 1,
				SFieldMaximumLengthValue = 1,
				PercentSumMinValue = 0,
				PercentSumMaxValue = 100,
			};


var builder = new ExpressValidatorBuilder<ObjToValidate, ObjToValidateOptions>()
			.AddProperty(o => o.I)
			//Get Greater Than validator parameter from options
			.WithValidation((to, p) => p.GreaterThan(to.IGreaterThanValue))
			.AddProperty(o => o.S)
			//Get MaxLength validator parameter from options
			.WithValidation((to, p)=> p.MaximumLength(to.SMaximumLengthValue))
			.AddField(o => o._sField)
			//Get MaxLength validator parameter from options for field
			.WithValidation((to, f) => f.MaximumLength(to.SFieldMaximumLengthValue))
			.AddFunc(o => o.PercentValue1 + o.PercentValue2, "percentSum")
			//Get InclusiveBetween validator parameters from options
			.WithValidation((to, f) => f.InclusiveBetween(to.PercentSumMinValue, to.PercentSumMaxValue));

//ValidationResult with parameters from objToValidateOptions
var result = builder	
			//Pass options in the Build method
			.Build(objToValidateOptions)
			.Validate(new ObjToValidate() { I = i, S = s, _sField = sf, PercentValue1 = pv1, PercentValue2 = pv2 });
				
if(!result.IsValid)
{
...
}		

var objToValidateOptions2 = new ObjToValidateOptions() {...};

var result2 = builder	
			//Pass other options in the Build method
			.Build(objToValidateOptions2)
			.Validate(new ObjToValidate() { I = i, S = s, _sField = sf, PercentValue1 = pv1, PercentValue2 = pv2 });

//Check IsValid after rebuild
if(!result2.IsValid)
{
...
}

Quick Validation

Quick validation is convenient for primitive types or types without properties/fields (here, 'quick' refers to usability, not performance). Simply call QuickValidator.Validate on the object with a preconfigured rule:

var value = 5;
// result.IsValid == false
// result.Errors[0].PropertyName == "value"
var result = QuickValidator.Validate(
	value,
	(opt) => opt.GreaterThan(10),
	nameof(value));

For complex types, use FluentValidation's ChildRules method:

var obj = new ObjToValidate() { I = -1, PercentValue1 = 101 };
// result.IsValid == false
// result.Errors.Count == 2
// result.Errors[0].PropertyName == "obj.I"; result.Errors[1].PropertyName == "obj.PercentValue1"
var result = QuickValidator.Validate(
	obj,
	(opt) =>
		opt
		.ChildRules((v) => v.RuleFor(o => o.I).GreaterThan(0))
		.ChildRules((v) => v.RuleFor(o => o.PercentValue1).InclusiveBetween(0, 100)),
	nameof(obj));

The QuickValidator also provides a ValidateAsync method for asynchronous validation.
It is also tolerant of null values, i.e., it avoids exceptions when the input is null.

Composition-Based Property Validation with SetExpressValidator

ExpressValidator provides the SetExpressValidator extension method for IRuleBuilder<T, TProperty>, enabling composition-based property validation instead of requiring inheritance from PropertyValidator.

Why Use SetExpressValidator?

In FluentValidation, creating custom property validators requires inheriting from PropertyValidator<T, TProperty> and implementing validation logic in a separate class. With SetExpressValidator, you can define complex property validation rules inline using the familiar ExpressValidatorBuilder API, avoiding the need for inheritance.

Key Benefits

• No inheritance required - Define validators inline without creating separate PropertyValidator classes
• Composition over inheritance - Build complex validators by composing existing rules
• Configurable validation - Use options to parameterize validation rules
• Custom error messages - Define message templates with dynamic arguments
• Seamless integration - Works naturally with FluentValidation's RuleFor syntax

Example: Validating Complex Properties

public class CatPerson
{
    public IList<Cat> Cats { get; set; } = new List<Cat>();
    public int Id { get; set; } = 20;
}

public class Cat {...}

public class CatsOptions
{
    public int CatsCount { get; set; }
    public int MinimumCats { get; set; }
}

public class CatPersonValidator : AbstractValidator<CatPerson>
{
    public CatPersonValidator()
    {
        // Validate the Cats collection's Count property using SetExpressValidator
        RuleFor(person => person.Cats)
            .SetExpressValidator(
                builder => builder
                    .Configure(b =>
                        b.AddProperty(p => p.Count)
                            .WithValidation((options, prop) =>
                                prop.LessThan(options.CatsCount)
                                    .GreaterThanOrEqualTo(options.MinimumCats)))
                    .WithMessageTemplate((ctx, value, result) =>
                        "{PropertyName} must contain fewer than {MaxElements} items " +
                        "and greater than or equal {MinElements} items.")
                    .WithTemplateArgument("MaxElements", o => o.CatsCount)
                    .WithTemplateArgument("MinElements", o => o.MinimumCats),
                new CatsOptions { CatsCount = 14, MinimumCats = 1 });

        // Validate Id using a simple inline validator
        RuleFor(person => person.Id)
            .SetExpressValidator(
                config => config.Configure(b =>
                    b.AddFunc(id => id, "Id")
                        .WithValidation((maxValue, prop) =>
                            prop.LessThan(maxValue))),
                1);
    }
}

// Usage
var validator = new CatPersonValidator();
var person = new CatPerson 
{ 
    Cats = new List<Cat> { new Cat(), new Cat() }, 
    Id = 0 
};

var result = validator.Validate(person);
// result.IsValid == true

Comparison with FluentValidation's Approach

Traditional FluentValidation (requires inheritance):

// Separate class required
public class CatsCountValidator : PropertyValidator<CatPerson, IList<Cat>>
{
    private readonly CatsOptions _options;
    
    public CatsCountValidator(CatsOptions options)
    {
        _options = options;
    }
    
    public override bool IsValid(ValidationContext<CatPerson> context, IList<Cat> value)
    {
        // Manual validation logic
        return value.Count < _options.CatsCount && 
               value.Count >= _options.MinimumCats;
    }
    
    // Manual error message handling
}

// Usage in validator
RuleFor(p => p.Cats).SetValidator(new CatsCountValidator(options));

ExpressValidator's SetExpressValidator (no inheritance):

// Inline definition - no separate class needed
RuleFor(person => person.Cats)
    .SetExpressValidator(
        builder => builder.Configure(b =>
            b.AddProperty(p => p.Count)
                .WithValidation((o, p) => 
                    p.LessThan(o.CatsCount)
                     .GreaterThanOrEqualTo(o.MinimumCats))),
        new CatsOptions { CatsCount = 14, MinimumCats = 1 });

Advanced Features

Custom Message Templates:

.WithMessageTemplate((context, value, validationResult) =>
    $"Custom error for {context.DisplayName}: {validationResult.Errors.Count} errors")

Template Arguments:

.WithTemplateArgument("MaxValue", options => options.MaxValue)
.WithTemplateArgument("MinValue", options => options.MinValue)

Multiple Property Validation:

builder.Configure(b => b
    .AddProperty(obj => obj.Property1)
        .WithValidation((opts, prop) => prop.NotEmpty())
    .AddProperty(obj => obj.Property2)
        .WithValidation((opts, prop) => prop.MaximumLength(opts.MaxLength)))

Nuances Of Using The Library

For ExpressValidatorBuilder methods (AddFunc, AddProperty, AddField, and AddMember), the overridden property name (set via FluentValidation's OverridePropertyName method in With(Async)Validation) takes precedence over the property name passed as a string or via Expression in AddFunc/AddProperty/AddField/AddMember.
For example, for the ObjToValidate object from the 'Quick Start' chapter, result.Errors[0].PropertyName will equal "percentSum" (the property name overridden in the validation rule):

// result.Errors[0].PropertyName == "percentSum"
var result = new ExpressValidatorBuilder<ObjToValidate>()
		.AddFunc(o => o.PercentValue1 + o.PercentValue2, "sum")
		.WithValidation((o) => o.InclusiveBetween(0, 100)
			.OverridePropertyName("percentSum"))
		.BuildAndValidate(new ObjToValidate() { PercentValue1 = 200});