Azure.Provisioning
1.4.0-beta.2
Prefix Reserved
dotnet add package Azure.Provisioning --version 1.4.0-beta.2
NuGet\Install-Package Azure.Provisioning -Version 1.4.0-beta.2
<PackageReference Include="Azure.Provisioning" Version="1.4.0-beta.2" />
<PackageVersion Include="Azure.Provisioning" Version="1.4.0-beta.2" />
<PackageReference Include="Azure.Provisioning" />
paket add Azure.Provisioning --version 1.4.0-beta.2
#r "nuget: Azure.Provisioning, 1.4.0-beta.2"
#:package Azure.Provisioning@1.4.0-beta.2
#addin nuget:?package=Azure.Provisioning&version=1.4.0-beta.2&prerelease
#tool nuget:?package=Azure.Provisioning&version=1.4.0-beta.2&prerelease
Azure Provisioning client library for .NET
Azure.Provisioning makes it easy to declaratively specify Azure infrastructure natively in .NET.
Getting started
Install the package
Install the client library for .NET with NuGet:
dotnet add package Azure.Provisioning
Prerequisites
You must have an Azure subscription.
Authenticate the Client
Key concepts
This library allows you to specify your infrastructure in a declarative style using dotnet. You can then use azd to deploy your infrastructure to Azure directly without needing to write or maintain bicep or arm templates.
Important Usage Guidelines
Declarative Design Pattern: Azure.Provisioning is designed for declarative infrastructure definition. Each resource and construct instance should represent a single infrastructure component. Avoid reusing the same instance across multiple properties or locations, as this can lead to unexpected behavior in the generated Bicep templates.
// ✅ Create separate instances
StorageAccount storage1 = new(nameof(storage1))
{
Sku = new StorageSku { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs }
};
StorageAccount storage2 = new(nameof(storage2))
{
Sku = new StorageSku { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs }
};
<details> <summary>❌ What NOT to do - Click to expand bad example</summary>
// ❌ DO NOT reuse the same instance
StorageSku sharedSku = new() { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs };
StorageAccount storage1 = new(nameof(storage1)) { Sku = sharedSku }; // ❌ Bad
StorageAccount storage2 = new(nameof(storage2)) { Sku = sharedSku }; // ❌ Bad
This pattern can lead to incorrect Bicep expressions when you build expressions on them. Details could be found in this section.
</details>
Safe Collection Access: You can safely access any index in a BicepList or any key in a BicepDictionary without exceptions. This is especially important when working with output properties from Azure resources, where the actual data doesn't exist at design time but you need to create references for the generated Bicep template.
// ✅ Accessing output properties safely - very common scenario
Infrastructure infra = new();
CognitiveServicesAccount aiServices = new("aiServices");
infra.Add(aiServices);
// Safe to access dictionary keys that exist in the deployed resource
// but not at design time - no KeyNotFoundException thrown
BicepValue<string> apiEndpoint = aiServices.Properties.Endpoints["Azure AI Model Inference API"];
// Works perfectly for building references in outputs
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("connectionString", typeof(string))
{
Value = BicepFunction.Interpolate($"Endpoint={apiEndpoint.ToBicepExpression()}")
});
// Generates: output connectionString string = 'Endpoint=${aiServices.properties.endpoints['Azure AI Model Inference API']}'
// ⚠️ Note: Accessing .Value will still throw at runtime if the data doesn't exist
// BicepValue<string> actualValue = apiEndpoint.Value; // Would throw KeyNotFoundException at runtime
This feature resolves common scenarios where you need to reference nested properties or collection items as outputs.
BicepValue types
BicepValue types are the foundation of Azure.Provisioning, providing a flexible type system that can represent literal .NET values, Bicep expressions, or unset properties. These types enable strongly-typed infrastructure definition while maintaining the flexibility needed for dynamic resource configuration.
Core BicepValue Types
BicepValue<T> - Represents a strongly-typed value that can be:
- A literal .NET value of type
T - A Bicep expression that evaluates to type
T - An unset value (usually one should get this state from the property of a constructed resource/construct)
BicepValue<string> literalName = "my-storage-account";
// Expression value
BicepValue<string> expressionName = BicepFunction.CreateGuid();
// Unset value (can be assigned later)
BicepValue<string> unsetName = storageAccount.Name;
BicepList<T> - Represents a collection of BicepValue<T> items that can be:
- A list of literal values
- A Bicep expression that evaluates to an array
- An unset list (usually one should get this state from the property of a constructed resource/construct)
// Literal list
BicepList<string> tagNames = new() { "Environment", "Project", "Owner" };
// Modifying items
tagNames.Add("CostCenter"); // add an item
tagNames.Remove("Owner"); // remove an item
tagNames[0] = "Env"; // modify an item
tagNames.Clear(); // clear all items
// Expression list (referencing a parameter)
ProvisioningParameter parameter = new(nameof(parameter), typeof(string[]));
BicepList<string> dynamicTags = parameter;
BicepDictionary<T> - Represents a key-value collection where values are BicepValue<T>:
- A dictionary of literal key-value pairs
- A Bicep expression that evaluates to an object
- An unset dictionary (usually one should get this state from the property of a constructed resource/construct)
// Literal dictionary
BicepDictionary<string> tags = new()
{
["Environment"] = "Production",
["Project"] = "WebApp",
["Owner"] = "DevTeam"
};
// Accessing values
tags["CostCenter"] = "12345";
// Expression dictionary
ProvisioningParameter parameter = new(nameof(parameter), typeof(object));
BicepDictionary<string> dynamicTags = parameter;
Working with Azure Resources
ProvisionableResource - Base class for Azure resources that provides resource-specific functionality. Users typically work with specific resource types like StorageAccount, VirtualNetwork, WebSite, etc. An instance of type ProvisionableResource corresponds to a resource statement in bicep language.
ProvisionableConstruct - Base class for infrastructure components that group related properties and resources. Most users will work with concrete implementations like StorageAccountSku, VirtualNetworkEncryption, etc. An instance of type ProvisionableConstruct usually corresponds to an object definition statement in bicep language.
Here's how you use the provided Azure resource classes:
// Define parameters for dynamic configuration
ProvisioningParameter location = new(nameof(location), typeof(string));
ProvisioningParameter environment = new(nameof(environment), typeof(string));
// Create a storage account with BicepValue properties
StorageAccount myStorage = new(nameof(myStorage), StorageAccount.ResourceVersions.V2023_01_01)
{
// Set literal values
Name = "mystorageaccount",
Kind = StorageKind.StorageV2,
// Use BicepValue for dynamic configuration
Location = location, // Reference a parameter
// Configure nested properties
Sku = new StorageSku
{
Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs
},
// Use BicepList for collections
Tags = new BicepDictionary<string>
{
["Environment"] = "Production",
["Project"] = environment // Mix literal and dynamic values
}
};
// Access output properties and use them in output (these are BicepValue<T> that reference the deployed resource)
ProvisioningOutput storageAccountId = new(nameof(storageAccountId), typeof(string))
{
Value = myStorage.Id
};
ProvisioningOutput primaryBlobEndpoint = new(nameof(primaryBlobEndpoint), typeof(string))
{
Value = myStorage.PrimaryEndpoints.BlobUri
};
ToBicepExpression Method
The ToBicepExpression() extension method allows you to create references to resource properties and values for use in Bicep expressions. This is essential when you need to reference one resource's properties in another resource or build dynamic configuration strings.
// Create a storage account
StorageAccount storage = new(nameof(storage), StorageAccount.ResourceVersions.V2023_01_01)
{
Name = "mystorageaccount",
Kind = StorageKind.StorageV2
};
// Reference the storage account name in a connection string
BicepValue<string> connectionString = BicepFunction.Interpolate(
$"AccountName={storage.Name.ToBicepExpression()};EndpointSuffix=core.windows.net"
);
// this would produce: 'AccountName=${storage.name};EndpointSuffix=core.windows.net'
// If we do not call ToBicepExpression()
BicepValue<string> nonExpressionConnectionString =
BicepFunction.Interpolate(
$"AccountName={storage.Name};EndpointSuffix=core.windows.net"
);
// this would produce: 'AccountName=mystorageaccount;EndpointSuffix=core.windows.net'
Use ToBicepExpression() whenever you need to reference a resource property or value in Bicep expressions, function calls, or when building dynamic configuration values.
Important Notes
NamedProvisionableConstruct Requirement:
ToBicepExpression() requires that the value can be traced back through a chain of properties to a root NamedProvisionableConstruct. The method recursively traverses up the property ownership chain until it finds a NamedProvisionableConstruct at the root.
Types that qualify as root NamedProvisionableConstruct:
- Azure resources (like
StorageAccount,CognitiveServicesAccount, etc.) - these inherit fromProvisionableResource - Infrastructure components like:
ProvisioningParameter- input parameters to your templateProvisioningOutput- output values from your templateProvisioningVariable- variables within your templateModuleImport- imported modules
How the traversal works:
- ✅
storage.Name- direct property ofStorageAccount(aNamedProvisionableConstruct) - ✅
storage.Sku.Name-Skuis a property ofStorageAccount,Nameis a property ofSku - ✅
storage.Properties.Encryption.Services.Blob.Enabled- any depth is supported as long as it traces back toStorageAccount - ✅
storage.Tags[0]- collection element where the collection (Tags) is a property ofStorageAccount - ✅
storage.NetworkRuleSet.VirtualNetworkRules[0].Action- element of a list property, then accessing a property of that element - ❌
new StorageSku().Name- standaloneStorageSkuhas no traceable path to aNamedProvisionableConstruct
This restriction exists because the generated Bicep expression needs an identifier to make it syntax correct (e.g., storage.sku.name or param.someProperty.value).
// ✅ Works - calling from a property of StorageAccount which inherits from ProvisionableResource
StorageAccount storage = new("myStorage");
BicepExpression nameRef = storage.Name.ToBicepExpression(); // Works
// ✅ Works - calling from a ProvisioningParameter
ProvisioningParameter param = new("myParam", typeof(string));
BicepExpression paramRef = param.ToBicepExpression(); // Works
// ❌ Throws exception - StorageSku is just a ProvisionableConstruct (not a NamedProvisionableConstruct)
StorageSku sku = new() { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs };
// BicepExpression badRef = sku.Name.ToBicepExpression(); // Throws exception
// ✅ Works - if you assign it to another NamedProvisionableConstruct first
storage.Sku = sku;
BicepExpression goodRef = storage.Sku.Name.ToBicepExpression(); // Works
Why Instance Sharing Fails:
As mentioned in the Declarative Design Pattern section, sharing the same construct instance across multiple properties leads to problems with ToBicepExpression(). Here's the correct approach and what happens when you don't follow it:
The correct approach:
// ✅ GOOD: Create separate instances with the same values
StorageAccount storage1 = new("storage1")
{
Sku = new StorageSku { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs }
};
StorageAccount storage2 = new("storage2")
{
Sku = new StorageSku { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs }
};
// Each has its own StorageSku instance
// Bicep expressions work correctly and unambiguously:
BicepExpression sku1Ref = storage1.Sku.Name.ToBicepExpression(); // "${storage1.sku.name}"
BicepExpression sku2Ref = storage2.Sku.Name.ToBicepExpression(); // "${storage2.sku.name}"
What NOT to do and why it fails:
// ❌ BAD: Sharing the same StorageSku instance
StorageSku sharedSku = new() { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs };
StorageAccount storage1 = new("storage1") { Sku = sharedSku };
StorageAccount storage2 = new("storage2") { Sku = sharedSku };
// Now both storage accounts reference the SAME StorageSku object
// This creates ambiguity when building Bicep expressions:
// ❌ PROBLEM: Which storage account should this reference?
// storage1.sku.name or storage2.sku.name?
BicepExpression skuNameRef = sharedSku.Name.ToBicepExpression(); // Confusing and unpredictable!
// The system can't determine whether this should generate:
// - "${storage1.sku.name}"
// - "${storage2.sku.name}"
// This leads to incorrect or unpredictable Bicep output.
Key takeaway: Each construct instance must have a single, unambiguous path back to its owning NamedProvisionableConstruct. Sharing instances breaks this requirement and makes Bicep reference generation impossible.
Examples
Create Basic Infrastructure
This example demonstrates how to create basic Azure infrastructure using the Azure.Provisioning framework, including a storage account with blob services and output values.
Infrastructure infra = new();
// Create a storage account and blob resources
StorageAccount storage =
new(nameof(storage), StorageAccount.ResourceVersions.V2023_01_01)
{
Kind = StorageKind.StorageV2,
Sku = new StorageSku { Name = StorageSkuName.StandardLrs },
IsHnsEnabled = true,
AllowBlobPublicAccess = false
};
infra.Add(storage);
BlobService blobs = new(nameof(blobs)) { Parent = storage };
infra.Add(blobs);
// Grab the endpoint
ProvisioningOutput endpoint = new ProvisioningOutput("blobs_endpoint", typeof(string)) { Value = storage.PrimaryEndpoints.BlobUri };
infra.Add(endpoint);
Create A Container App Environment
This example shows how to create a complete container application environment with managed identity, container registry, log analytics workspace, and container app environment with the Aspire dashboard.
Infrastructure infra = new();
ProvisioningParameter principalId = new(nameof(principalId), typeof(string)) { Value = "" };
infra.Add(principalId);
ProvisioningParameter tags = new(nameof(tags), typeof(object)) { Value = new BicepDictionary<string>() };
infra.Add(tags);
UserAssignedIdentity mi =
new(nameof(mi), UserAssignedIdentity.ResourceVersions.V2023_01_31)
{
Tags = tags,
};
infra.Add(mi);
ContainerRegistryService acr =
new(nameof(acr), ContainerRegistryService.ResourceVersions.V2023_07_01)
{
Sku = new ContainerRegistrySku() { Name = ContainerRegistrySkuName.Basic },
Tags = tags,
Identity =
new ManagedServiceIdentity
{
ManagedServiceIdentityType = ManagedServiceIdentityType.SystemAssignedUserAssigned,
UserAssignedIdentities =
{
// TODO: Decide if we want to invest in a less janky way to use expressions as keys
{ BicepFunction.Interpolate($"{mi.Id}").Compile().ToString(), new UserAssignedIdentityDetails() }
}
}
};
infra.Add(acr);
RoleAssignment pullAssignment = acr.CreateRoleAssignment(ContainerRegistryBuiltInRole.AcrPull, mi);
infra.Add(pullAssignment);
OperationalInsightsWorkspace law =
new(nameof(law), OperationalInsightsWorkspace.ResourceVersions.V2023_09_01)
{
Sku = new OperationalInsightsWorkspaceSku() { Name = OperationalInsightsWorkspaceSkuName.PerGB2018 },
Tags = tags,
};
infra.Add(law);
ContainerAppManagedEnvironment cae =
new(nameof(cae), ContainerAppManagedEnvironment.ResourceVersions.V2024_03_01)
{
WorkloadProfiles =
{
new ContainerAppWorkloadProfile()
{
Name = "consumption",
WorkloadProfileType = "Consumption"
}
},
AppLogsConfiguration =
new ContainerAppLogsConfiguration()
{
Destination = "log-analytics",
LogAnalyticsConfiguration = new ContainerAppLogAnalyticsConfiguration()
{
CustomerId = law.CustomerId,
SharedKey = law.GetKeys().PrimarySharedKey,
}
},
Tags = tags,
};
infra.Add(cae);
RoleAssignment contribAssignment = cae.CreateRoleAssignment(AppContainersBuiltInRole.Contributor, mi);
infra.Add(contribAssignment);
// Hack in the Aspire Dashboard as a literal since there's no
// management plane library support for dotNetComponents yet
BicepLiteral aspireDashboard =
new(
new ResourceStatement(
"aspireDashboard",
new StringLiteralExpression("Microsoft.App/managedEnvironments/dotNetComponents@2024-02-02-preview"),
new ObjectExpression(
new PropertyExpression("name", "aspire-dashboard"),
new PropertyExpression("parent", new IdentifierExpression(cae.BicepIdentifier)),
new PropertyExpression("properties",
new ObjectExpression(
new PropertyExpression("componentType", new StringLiteralExpression("AspireDashboard")))))));
infra.Add(aspireDashboard);
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("MANAGED_IDENTITY_CLIENT_ID", typeof(string)) { Value = mi.ClientId });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("MANAGED_IDENTITY_NAME", typeof(string)) { Value = mi.Name });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("MANAGED_IDENTITY_PRINCIPAL_ID", typeof(string)) { Value = mi.PrincipalId });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("LOG_ANALYTICS_WORKSPACE_NAME", typeof(string)) { Value = law.Name });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("LOG_ANALYTICS_WORKSPACE_ID", typeof(string)) { Value = law.Id });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("AZURE_CONTAINER_REGISTRY_ENDPOINT", typeof(string)) { Value = acr.LoginServer });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("AZURE_CONTAINER_REGISTRY_MANAGED_IDENTITY_ID", typeof(string)) { Value = mi.Id });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("AZURE_CONTAINER_APPS_ENVIRONMENT_NAME", typeof(string)) { Value = cae.Name });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("AZURE_CONTAINER_APPS_ENVIRONMENT_ID", typeof(string)) { Value = cae.Id });
infra.Add(new ProvisioningOutput("AZURE_CONTAINER_APPS_ENVIRONMENT_DEFAULT_DOMAIN", typeof(string)) { Value = cae.DefaultDomain });
Create A Resource Group At Subscription Scope
This example demonstrates creating a resource group at the subscription scope, which is useful when you need to manage resource groups themselves as part of your infrastructure.
// Create a new infra group scoped to our subscription and add
// the resource group
Infrastructure infra = new() { TargetScope = DeploymentScope.Subscription };
ResourceGroup rg = new("rg_test", "2024-03-01");
infra.Add(rg);
Troubleshooting
- File an issue via GitHub Issues.
- Check previous questions or ask new ones on Stack Overflow using Azure and .NET tags.
Next steps
Contributing
For details on contributing to this repository, see the contributing guide.
This project welcomes contributions and suggestions. Most contributions require you to agree to a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) declaring that you have the right to, and actually do, grant us the rights to use your contribution. For details, visit https://cla.microsoft.com.
When you submit a pull request, a CLA-bot will automatically determine whether you need to provide a CLA and decorate the PR appropriately (for example, label, comment). Follow the instructions provided by the bot. You'll only need to do this action once across all repositories using our CLA.
This project has adopted the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct. For more information, see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact opencode@microsoft.com with any other questions or comments.
| Product | Versions Compatible and additional computed target framework versions. |
|---|---|
| .NET | net5.0 was computed. net5.0-windows was computed. net6.0 was computed. net6.0-android was computed. net6.0-ios was computed. net6.0-maccatalyst was computed. net6.0-macos was computed. net6.0-tvos was computed. net6.0-windows was computed. net7.0 was computed. net7.0-android was computed. net7.0-ios was computed. net7.0-maccatalyst was computed. net7.0-macos was computed. net7.0-tvos was computed. net7.0-windows was computed. net8.0 is compatible. net8.0-android was computed. net8.0-browser was computed. net8.0-ios was computed. net8.0-maccatalyst was computed. net8.0-macos was computed. net8.0-tvos was computed. net8.0-windows was computed. net9.0 was computed. net9.0-android was computed. net9.0-browser was computed. net9.0-ios was computed. net9.0-maccatalyst was computed. net9.0-macos was computed. net9.0-tvos was computed. net9.0-windows was computed. net10.0 was computed. net10.0-android was computed. net10.0-browser was computed. net10.0-ios was computed. net10.0-maccatalyst was computed. net10.0-macos was computed. net10.0-tvos was computed. net10.0-windows was computed. |
| .NET Core | netcoreapp2.0 was computed. netcoreapp2.1 was computed. netcoreapp2.2 was computed. netcoreapp3.0 was computed. netcoreapp3.1 was computed. |
| .NET Standard | netstandard2.0 is compatible. netstandard2.1 was computed. |
| .NET Framework | net461 was computed. net462 was computed. net463 was computed. net47 was computed. net471 was computed. net472 was computed. net48 was computed. net481 was computed. |
| MonoAndroid | monoandroid was computed. |
| MonoMac | monomac was computed. |
| MonoTouch | monotouch was computed. |
| Tizen | tizen40 was computed. tizen60 was computed. |
| Xamarin.iOS | xamarinios was computed. |
| Xamarin.Mac | xamarinmac was computed. |
| Xamarin.TVOS | xamarintvos was computed. |
| Xamarin.WatchOS | xamarinwatchos was computed. |
-
.NETStandard 2.0
- Azure.Core (>= 1.50.0)
-
net8.0
- Azure.Core (>= 1.50.0)
NuGet packages (54)
Showing the top 5 NuGet packages that depend on Azure.Provisioning:
| Package | Downloads |
|---|---|
|
Aspire.Hosting.Azure
Azure resource types for Aspire. |
|
|
Azure.Provisioning.KeyVault
Azure.Provisioning.KeyVault simplifies declarative resource provisioning in .NET. |
|
|
Azure.Provisioning.Storage
Azure.Provisioning.Storage simplifies declarative resource provisioning in .NET for Azure Storage. |
|
|
Aspire.Hosting.Azure.Storage
Azure Storage resource types for Aspire. |
|
|
Aspire.Hosting.Azure.KeyVault
Azure resource types for Aspire. |
GitHub repositories (1)
Showing the top 1 popular GitHub repositories that depend on Azure.Provisioning:
| Repository | Stars |
|---|---|
|
dotnet/aspire
Aspire is the tool for code-first, extensible, observable dev and deploy.
|
| Version | Downloads | Last Updated |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4.0-beta.2 | 325 | 11/11/2025 |
| 1.4.0-beta.1 | 3,082 | 9/3/2025 |
| 1.3.0 | 389,589 | 8/1/2025 |
| 1.2.1 | 318,568 | 7/14/2025 |
| 1.2.0 | 401,292 | 7/8/2025 |
| 1.1.0 | 561,033 | 6/17/2025 |
| 1.0.1 | 1,255 | 6/4/2025 |
| 1.0.0 | 1,350,341 | 10/25/2024 |
| 1.0.0-beta.1 | 17,270 | 10/5/2024 |
| 0.3.0 | 209,964 | 5/16/2024 |
| 0.2.0 | 73,844 | 4/27/2024 |
| 0.2.0-beta.2 | 300 | 4/9/2024 |
| 0.2.0-beta.1 | 9,633 | 4/5/2024 |
| 0.1.0-beta.2 | 9,946 | 3/29/2024 |
| 0.1.0-beta.1 | 114 | 3/26/2024 |